中文导读 你觉得自己用 AI 主要是为了学习，那你的同学呢？美国达特茅斯学院的一项新调查发现，大学生对自己和对别人的判断差别很大。文章先用这个反差引出话题；再介绍调查的对象、规模和公布背景；接着用两组数字说明“自己很少走捷径，却认为同学经常这样做”，并提醒这些答案是学生自己报告的；然后说明这种看法带来的影响，比如觉得课后作业不公平、感到不得不用 AI；随后列出学生眼中 AI 的好处和风险，以及不同学科学生的看法差异；最后引用研究负责人的话，交代大学可以怎样回应。阅读时可留意 however、while、but 如何表达对比，以及 may、seems 等词如何为结论留出余地。
正文 If you ask college students how they use AI , most say they use it to learn . Ask them about their classmates , however , and the picture changes . A new survey from Dartmouth College in the United States found a large gap between what students say about themselves and what they believe other students do .
本段译文 如果你问大学生他们怎样使用 AI，大多数人会说是用来学习的。然而，问到他们的同学时，情况就不一样了。美国达特茅斯学院的一项新调查发现，学生对自己的描述与他们认为其他学生的做法之间存在很大差距。
The Dartmouth AI Survey asked 1,003 college students from across the US and 1,533 students at Dartmouth for their views . Students were asked about their classmates first and then about themselves . The first results were shared on October 30 at a conference marking 70 years since a summer project at Dartmouth in 1956 that started the field of artificial intelligence . The survey will be repeated every year .
本段译文 “达特茅斯 AI 调查”询问了来自全美各地的 1003 名大学生以及达特茅斯学院的 1533 名学生的看法。学生先被问到同学的情况，然后才被问到自己。首批结果于 10 月 30 日在一次会议上公布，这次会议纪念 1956 年达特茅斯的一个夏季项目 70 周年，正是那个项目开创了人工智能这一领域。这项调查将每年重复进行。
The gap is easy to see in the numbers . Only 11% of US students said they used AI to find answers for problem sets , but 49% thought their peers did . Just 8% said they copied AI text with little editing , while 50% believed others did so . The answers were self reported , however , so some students may describe their own habits more kindly than they really are .
本段译文 从数字上很容易看出这种差距。只有 11% 的美国学生说自己用 AI 找习题答案，但有 49% 认为同学这样做。仅 8% 说自己几乎不加修改就复制 AI 生成的文字，而 50% 认为别人会这样做。不过，这些答案都是学生自己报告的，所以有些学生描述自己的习惯时，可能比实际情况说得更好听。
This belief seems to have real effects . Seventy percent of the national group said take-home work has become unfair because of AI . About 39% said they felt pressure to use AI because their classmates did . Among new Dartmouth students asked before they arrived , only 14% felt this way .
本段译文 这种看法似乎带来了实际影响。全美样本中有 70% 的学生说，课后作业因为 AI 变得不公平了。约 39% 说因为同学在用，他们感到有压力也要用 AI。而在入学前接受调查的达特茅斯新生中，只有 14% 有这种感受。
Students also see both sides of the tool . Some 61% use AI to explain difficult ideas , and 52% said working back and forth with it gives better results than either they or the AI could produce alone . At the same time , 84% said using AI for writing can hurt the development of writing skills . Most also said they had mainly taught themselves , with 79% saying they learned their AI skills on their own .
本段译文 学生也看到了这个工具的两面。约 61% 用 AI 解释难懂的概念，52% 说与 AI 来回协作得出的结果，比他们或 AI 单独完成的都要好。与此同时，84% 说用 AI 写作会妨碍写作能力的培养。多数人还说主要是靠自学，79% 表示自己的 AI 技能是自己学会的。
Views differed more by subject than by year of study . At Dartmouth , 70% of science students said AI deepens their understanding , compared with 48% in arts and humanities . Many students expect AI skills to matter for their careers , but most at Dartmouth said AI is changing jobs in their field rather than removing them .
本段译文 看法的差异更多来自学科，而不是年级。在达特茅斯，70% 的理科学生说 AI 加深了他们的理解，而文科和人文学科的学生中这一比例为 48%。许多学生预计 AI 技能会对自己的职业很重要，但达特茅斯的大多数学生认为，AI 正在改变他们所在领域的工作，而不是让这些工作消失。
Bruce Sacerdote , the economist leading the research , said students want to use AI to learn but assume the people around them are cutting corners . He believes universities can respond by helping students think critically . Dartmouth is now also asking employers whether AI is changing jobs for people just starting their careers
本段译文 主持这项研究的经济学家布鲁斯·萨切尔多特（Bruce Sacerdote）说，学生想用 AI 来学习，却认为身边的人在走捷径。他认为，大学可以通过帮助学生进行批判性思考来应对。达特茅斯目前还在询问雇主，AI 是否正在改变面向刚入职场者的工作岗位。
新闻来源