中文导读 Chemistry World于2026年10月14日报道《Journal of Chemical Education》一项新研究：神经多样性本科生如何理解有机化学中的分子结构图。约30%的86名受试者自我认同为神经多样性。在楔形图与椅式图转换任务中，他们用时与自信程度与同伴相近，但平均正确率略低，更常依赖个人规则或中途换策略；同时也更常反思自己的推理并发展补偿方法。本文说明发现、课堂障碍与研究边界。
正文 Do chemistry diagrams feel different for every student ? On October 14, 2026, Chemistry World reported a new Journal of Chemical Education study on how neurodivergent undergraduates reason with molecular diagrams . About 30 percent of 86 organic chemistry students at a U .S . university identified as neurodivergent . On a computer task translating between wedge and chair drawings of 40 molecules , all groups finished in similar time and with similar confidence . On average though , neurodivergent students scored moderately lower accuracy than their peers .
本段译文 化学分子图对每位学生来说感觉都一样吗？2026年10月14日，Chemistry World报道《Journal of Chemical Education》一项新研究：神经多样性本科生如何理解分子结构图。一所美国大学86名有机化学学生中，约30%自我认同为神经多样性。在一项要求在40个分子的楔形图与椅式图之间转换的电脑任务中，各组用时与自信程度相近，但平均而言，神经多样性学生的正确率略低于同龄同伴。
Neurodiversity describes natural differences in how people process and respond to information . It includes ADHD , autism , and dyslexia . Each difference can help or hinder problem solving depending on the task Chemistry demands mathematical logic , spectral reading , and spatial – structural skill . Maia Popova of the University of North Carolina at Greensboro stresses that representational competence — interpreting structures translating formats , and using them to solve problems — is foundational for later courses Until this study , little was known about how neurodivergent students use their strengths and manage challenges in that work .
本段译文 神经多样性指人们处理和回应信息方式的自然差异，包括ADHD、自闭症与阅读障碍等。每一种差异都可能在解题时成为助力或阻碍，取决于任务类型。化学需要数学逻辑、光谱解读与空间—结构技能。北卡罗来纳大学格林斯伯勒分校的Maia Popova强调，表征能力——解读结构、在不同格式间转换并用其解题——是后续课程的基础。在此研究之前，人们几乎不知道神经多样性学生如何发挥优势、应对这一路径上的挑战。
Popova and PhD student Audrey Gay ran the structural translation task , then interviewed students about eight items . Non-neurodivergent students more often kept a consistent , systematic approach that yielded high accuracy . Neurodivergent students more often relied on personal rules — for example , that a wedge always marks an axial group — or switched strategies when stuck . Those shifts more often led to confused explanations and lower accuracy . Gay notes that a higher share fell into inconsistent or unproductive reasoning profiles , yet they also reflected deeply on their thinking and developed personal accommodations .
本段译文 Popova与博士生Audrey Gay先完成结构转换任务，再请学生口头解释其中八题。非神经多样性学生更常保持一致、系统的方法，因而正确率较高。神经多样性学生更常依赖自订规则——例如楔形总表示直立基团——或在卡住时切换策略，更容易出现混乱解释与较低正确率。Gay指出，更高比例落入不一致或低效的推理类型；但他们也深度反思自己的思维，并发展出个人化的应对方式。
In class , many neurodivergent students described real barriers attention span during long lectures and visual overload on crowded slides . They built annotation systems , personal routines , and online resources to compensate . Popova argues that this hard personal work should be matched by instructor and university support . Kevin Morgan , a chemical education specialist at Queen’s University Belfast , calls the paper a positive first step . Universal design for learning , he says , means designing content and assessment so difference is allowed without treating it as a lack of capability .
本段译文 课堂上，许多神经多样性学生谈到真实障碍：长讲座中的注意力时长，以及拥挤幻灯片带来的视觉过载。他们用批注系统、个人习惯与在线资源来补偿。Popova认为，这些个人努力应得到教师与大学管理者配套支持。贝尔法斯特女王大学化学教育专家Kevin Morgan称该文是积极的第一步。他说，通用学习设计意味着设计内容与测评时允许差异，而不是把它当成能力不足。
The study is exploratory . The sample was modest , neurodivergence was self-reported , and the tasks focused on one kind of molecular representation . Morgan hopes future work will cover more forms of neurodiversity and larger groups . Still , the practical message is clear : inclusive chemistry teaching starts by noticing how students reason , not only whether the final answer is right . When courses reduce unnecessary barriers , more students can show what they already know how to do .
本段译文 这项研究仍属探索性：样本不大，神经多样性为自我报告，任务也只聚焦一类分子表征。Morgan希望未来覆盖更多神经多样性形式与更大群体。但现实启示已经清楚：包容的化学教学始于观察学生如何推理，而不只看最终答案对不对。当课程减少不必要的障碍，更多学生就能展现他们本已具备的能力。
新闻来源